We already made the case that AI strategy is really an org design problem. That argument stands. The next question is the one we actually argue about in the field, between meetings, on the drive home from a conference: what are the teams winning with AI doing differently, day to day?

We keep having a version of the same conversation. Smart people point out that AI leads to cognitive decay. Everybody just looks for the answer, the tool hands it over, and the thinking muscle goes soft. It is a sharp point, and the risk is real. But our answer is that it is not a but, it is an and. There are two paths, and the one you end up on is a choice you make in how you build.

Path A is the one the skeptics are pointing at. The tool is a black box. You ask, it answers, you copy, you move on. The person sits at the end of the workflow, not inside it. Nobody learns anything, because there was no thinking in it. Do that a thousand times and the muscle atrophies. If that is how you deploy AI, the decay is real.

Path B is the one we are living in at Ignite, and it produces the opposite effect. The pilot sits in the middle of the workflow. There are very few black boxes inside our org. The tool is a partner they reason with, not a vending machine they pull from. When the machine gets better, the pilot gets stretched, not sidelined. They take on harder problems, ask sharper questions, and stay more engaged. The neurons fire faster, not slower. Instead of cognitive decay, we get cognitive momentum, and it compounds every day we fly.

Same technology, two outcomes. The difference is not the model. It is whether you designed the human into the center of the work or out of it.

That is why the pattern is counterintuitive. The more capable the tools get, the more human skills decide the outcome. Judgment, first: AI will generate ten plausible answers in seconds, but knowing which one is right for this customer, this deal, this moment is still a human call. Empathy, second: when a buyer is nervous about handing part of their business to software, no model closes that gap, a person does. And cross-functional translation, third: AI makes it cheap to produce work inside any single function, but someone still has to sit between the technical reality and the customer promise and make sure they match.

We think about the tools like an Iron Man suit. The suit is incredible, but worthless without the person inside it making the calls. A new hire at Ignite test-flies the suit in week one and ships real work faster than anyone could a few years ago. What we hire and coach for is the pilot. That is Path B in practice. Most companies are building better machines. We are building better pilots, and the two evolve with each other.

This is not a framework we sketched on a whiteboard. It is what happens because we are flying every day. Every deal, every customer call, every internal build is another rep in the suit. This is really just us describing what the flight logs already show.

Conway's Law is worth remembering. Organizations ship their own structure, and the tools amplify whatever is already there. Path A gets faster, and so does Path B. The tool does not pick for you.

So the takeaway for anyone building a team right now is not to chase the longest list of AI tools. It is to ask which human skills your people need to get more out of the tools they already have. Hire for judgment. Reward the person who reads the room. Protect the ones who translate between engineering and the customer.

The more AI we get, the more human we need to be. Not as a slogan. As a hiring plan, and as the way we fly every single day.

Bay Area Startups Collectively Secured $17.7B+ in August MTD

Total dollars fell but the number of deals went up this week as we passed $17B with one business day to go. This week's six megadeals made up just 63% of the total, down from 93% for last week. The week included multiple early stage and some late. More AI infrastructure week's fundings included multiple startups focused on AI infrastructure startups, including Emerald AI (connecting grid and AI infrastructure) and Agentrys (agentic AI for semiconductor design).

Browse the full list here:

AI Infrastructure companies August week 4.

Startups: Looking for partners or possible competitors? LinkSV's Pulse of the Valley weekday newsletter keeps you on top of new companies coming out of accelerators and a quick search of the database by keyword gives you targets to investigate and approach. Founders get the newsletter, database and alerts for just $7/month ($50 value). Check it out and sign up here.

Follow LinkSV on LinkedIn to get early notice of new tech, stay on top of SV funding intelligence, and keep track of the companies, investors and executives impacting the startup ecosystem..

Early Stage:

• Emerald AI closed a $150M Series A, provides an intelligent interface between power grids and AI infrastructure.

• Deep Cogito closed a $43M Series A, builds frontier open-weight models and creates pecialized models trained on enterprises' proprietary data, decisions and outcomes.

• Voya Energy closed a $35M Series A, converting abundant, high-energy, recycled metals into a powerful, safe, durable fuel.

• Agentrys closed a $19.1M Seed, enabling semiconductor design teams to build, own, and continuously improve their own agentic engineering workforce.

• OneTriangle closed a $.5M Pre-Seed, building the cheapest, fastest inference, cutting inference prefill costs by 20% and time-to-first-token by 40%.

Growth Stage:

• Generalist AI closed a $200M Series B, an AI robotics company building general intelligence for the physical world and making it useful to everyone.

• Gatik closed a $200M Series D, autonomous Middle Mile logistics, delivers goods safely and efficiently using its fleet of light and medium duty trucks.

• Liner closed a $36.1M Series C, an evidence-first AI research platform designed for people who need answers they can verify.

• Lilac Solutions closed a $34.4M Series D, their ion change technology enables high lithium recovery with minimal water use and no evaporation ponds.

• Celera Semiconductor closed a $30M Series B, redefining the future of analog IC design.

Tensor Machines

AI systems increasingly depend on information coming directly from the physical world. Sensors, GPUs, circuit boards, autonomous systems, and other connected hardware are producing the data these systems use to make decisions.

That creates a fundamental problem. How do you know the hardware is authentic and the data coming from it can actually be trusted?

For operators, the need is straightforward: continuously verify the physical systems underneath AI, rather than assuming they are behaving as expected.

That is where Tensor Machines fits.

Who they are
Tensor Machines is building a physics based hardware authentication and sensor data integrity platform for AI infrastructure and cyber physical systems.

What they deliver
Their technology uses the physical signatures naturally produced by electronic hardware, including electromagnetic, thermal, and power signals, to create a unique fingerprint of a device. Tensor Machines can then use those fingerprints to continuously verify hardware authenticity and integrity while equipment is operating.

That gives operators another layer of visibility for identifying altered or counterfeit hardware, detecting physical layer anomalies, and validating the integrity of sensor data feeding critical systems.

Who they serve
The technology is relevant across AI infrastructure, autonomous systems, robotics, defense, industrial environments, and other applications where connected electronics and sensor data have to remain trustworthy.

Tensor Machines was also selected as a 2025 DataTribe Challenge finalist, bringing its approach to physical layer security in front of cybersecurity leaders, investors, and potential customers.

As AI gains greater control over physical systems, the integrity of the hardware and sensor data underneath those decisions becomes increasingly important.

Your Feedback Matters!

Your feedback is crucial in helping us refine our content and maintain the newsletter's value for you and your fellow readers. We welcome your suggestions on how we can improve our offering. [email protected] 

Logan Lemery
Head of Content // Team Ignite

Blu Dot surpasses 2,000% ROAS with self-serve CTV ads

Blu Dot used Roku Ads Manager to drive incredible results for its furniture sales event. Its strategy hinged on custom audiences and retargeting, where intent was strongest.

“Roku has been a top performer,” said Blu Dot’s Claire Folkestad. “We have seen…CPMs lower than any other CTV partner we've worked with.”

Learn More